The self-defined measure’s sensitivity to correctly identify MBI-assessed burnout was 50.4% for clinicians and 58.6% for staff specificity was 94.7% for clinicians and 92.3% for staff. In contrast, 29% of clinicians (95% CI: 25–33%) and 31% of staff (95% CI: 28–35%) reported “definitely burning out” or more severe symptoms on the self-defined burnout measure. Similar to other nationally representative burnout estimates, 52% of clinicians (95% CI: 47–57%) and 46% of staff (95% CI: 42–50%) reported high MBI emotional exhaustion or high MBI cynicism. (J Am Board Fam Med 27(2):229–38, 2014) and a standard question about workplace atmosphere as reported by Rassolian et al. Concurrent validity was assessed using a validated, 7-item team culture scale as reported by Willard-Grace et al. The MBI measure, calculated from a high score on either the emotional exhaustion or cynicism subscale, and a single-item measure of self-defined burnout. Participantsįour hundred forty-four primary care clinicians and 606 staff from three San Francisco Aarea healthcare systems. DesignĬross-sectional survey (November 2016–January 2017). To identify the sensitivity, specificity, and concurrent validity of the self-defined burnout measure compared to the more established MBI measure. Relatively little is known about how the measures compare. ![]() Two common burnout assessments are the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and a single-item, self-defined burnout measure. Clinicians and healthcare staff report high levels of burnout.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |